<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Smokefree DC &#187; buildings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.smokefreedc.org/tag/buildings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.smokefreedc.org</link>
	<description>Smokefree air for Washington DC workers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:31:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Building owners soon will be able to post &#8220;no smoking&#8221; signs</title>
		<link>http://www.smokefreedc.org/2010/01/building-owners-soon-will-be-able-to-post-no-smoking-signs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.smokefreedc.org/2010/01/building-owners-soon-will-be-able-to-post-no-smoking-signs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 21:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Angela Bradbery</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buildings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sidewalk cafes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sidewalks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smokefree]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smokefreedc.org/?p=80</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The D.C. Council today took a solid step toward firming up the city&#8217;s smokefree workplace law and ensuring that workers aren&#8217;t exposed to secondhand smoke on the job. In unanimously approving on first reading bill 18-428, the &#8220;Prohibition Against Selling  Tobacco Products to Minors Amendment Act of 2009,&#8221; the Council clarified that building owners can [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The D.C. Council today took a solid step toward firming up the city&#8217;s smokefree workplace law and ensuring that workers aren&#8217;t exposed to secondhand smoke on the job. In unanimously approving on first reading bill 18-428, the &#8220;Prohibition Against Selling  Tobacco Products to Minors Amendment Act of 2009,&#8221; the Council clarified that building owners can post &#8220;no smoking&#8221; signs in front of their buildings.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a simple and very basic measure that will greatly help those who suffer when tobacco smoke enters buildings. It&#8217;s not a ban &#8211; there is no enforcement in the new legislation. However, we hope that smokers will abide by the request and move down the street.</p>
<p><span id="more-80"></span>When smoke drifts inside buildings, the purpose of the smokefree workplace law &#8211; to protect all workers from the carcinogens in secondhand smoke &#8211; is violated. Smokefree DC has received quite a few calls from people, including a worker in a cardiologist&#8217;s office, reporting that smoke is a chronic problem. We hope this will be a fix.</p>
<p>One worrisome thing is an amendment offered by the restaurant association &#8212; and approved by the Council &#8212; designed to ensure that sidewalk cafes aren&#8217;t affected if neighboring buildings post no-smoking signs. We are a bit concerned it could be interpreted to mean sidewalk cafes can&#8217;t be smokefree if they wish. Councilmember Phil Mendelson assured us that wasn&#8217;t the case; we are still looking into it.</p>
<p>This provision is a lot weaker than it could have been &#8211; some jurisdictions prohibit smoking within a set number of feet from entranceways. Check out, for instance, <a href="http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=70.160.075">Washington state&#8217;s provision</a>.</p>
<p>The bill also will make it harder for minors to obtain tobacco &#8211; see the <a href="http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/local/D_C_-Council-takes-up-tighter-smoking-restrictions-8717966-80655307.html">Washington Examiner&#8217;s write-up</a>.</p>
<p>There is still one more hurdle ; the D.C. Council needs to vote on more time on the bill. That should be later this month or in February.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.smokefreedc.org/2010/01/building-owners-soon-will-be-able-to-post-no-smoking-signs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
